InvestorsHub Logo

Frackedup

09/18/14 3:57 PM

#11357 RE: stockpicker7 #11356

This is not a patent infringement case, how could it be when tmm HAS NO PATENTS!

4retire

09/18/14 4:11 PM

#11358 RE: stockpicker7 #11356

You posted: "............I can guarantee you that if there was NOT an injunction "

There you go again....guaranteeing something of which you have no knowledge. There is no injunction at this time. If TMMI were to win this case they would probably then get one. TMMI's lawyer asked for an injunction but it wasn't granted.

Is there anything else you wish to guarantee? Stock price maybe?

jay14

09/18/14 4:17 PM

#11360 RE: stockpicker7 #11356

Agreed!!.It's all about"Patent & Trademark Infringement Litigation law" Also Judge Ellsworth made it very clear "Tenative Ruling" The Plaintiffs have already ask for the "Permament Injunction"Which will take place after they win this case!!. What we have here is a "Preliminary Injunction", entered by a court prior to a final determination of the merits of a legal case, in order to restrain a party from going ahead with a course of conduct or compelling a party to continue with a course of conduct until the case has been decided.And you're right,if there was NO Injunction the Defendants would of moved forward with those LOI's that they bragged about this past April..
TMMI TRUDEF moves onward and upward Worldwide!!.