InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HALF FULL GLASS

04/11/06 4:39 PM

#2822 RE: bocxman #2821

Bocxman,

My guess is that a potential Lisencing company performed this. You know that Dr. Moro would have included the authors name if he was allowed. I believe we will find the source in the next lisencing anouncement.

Yippeeeeee
icon url

longterm42

04/11/06 5:04 PM

#2824 RE: bocxman #2821

boxman, you are absolutely rigth. i'm not saying that i don't trust DR MORO, (i would not be here if i didn't) the accuracy is fantastic, but the result of a test like this has to have independent varification to be fully credited. that would really help to get this stock moving imo.
icon url

erthang

04/11/06 8:24 PM

#2837 RE: bocxman #2821

I get your point bocxman. Moro knows the technology works. He is not interested in "HIRING" a third party research company at this stage to verify these findings. He is focused on licensing the technology right now and allowing interested pharmas to do their own verification. And, in the meantime, using the company's resources to further develop the technology into other applications. He knows the third party verification will come and he won't have to pay for it once more big wigs get on board! Dr. Moro's agenda differs from yours. Dr. Moro understands that the value of this technology is unlimited. He knows the price of this stock will blow up soon enough. He is looking out for the long term interest of the company, and can give a rat's @ss about you making a quick buck on a sudden great spike! I think Dr. Moro's focus is in the right place. Your impatience makes you frustrated! Perhaps you should have used disposable income to invest, that you could afford to let sit, instead of mortgaging your house! lol