"all 5 patents denied".....
So they say... maybe, maybe not. I fried to find that info before i posted my theory. I could not find such info. Maybe I didn't know where to look, but I tried until I was tired of looking for it. So kindly give link to the info for when & why the 5 patents denied. Actually tho, this has been about LI, so all I need to see in terms of that is the LI denial (but I would like to see the info for the other 4 denials also). This should be easy for you, as I can see how certain you are about the fact, therefore you must have found the bona-fide info for it. I really did try, last week.
If u can show that is what happened, then yes, it would go some distance towards providing a possible explanations for msofts action that I brought into question. But, it depends also on the dates of actions for both vp & ms. And if I'm not mistaken, it seems almost as tho ms kept trying even after vp rcvd initial approval for LI.
"Why did ms hired digif guys?"...
I don't know, did they for a fact. Proof? Links?
And if it is true then, as you say, that MS gave up shortly after vp approval, then I must ask... let's see... how long ago was that since the initial approval from USPTO? That's quite awhile ago, isn't it? If it was AS IMPERATIVE, as the picture you paint, for MS to get the patent, then explain to me why they apparently haven't "done what they had to do" since then and leaped??? What would've say a $2 bil offer been to them w/their money? And you think we would have caught some kind of wind of that by now? I don't think so, but then again, you wouldn't know bcuz my English, grammar, sentence structure, spelling & general ability to articulate, is, according to you, so poor that you don't even read what I say, because you cannot understand it. Sorry, I try hard.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
