Replies to post #34623 on In Ovations Holdings Inc. (INOH)

[DJ Ponder]

Here is a boatload of bogus CLAIMS made by and on behalf of this STEAMING PILE.

THE WORD "NOPE" should be self explanatory'

INOH - JUST SAY NOPE

1. MEXP IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GE - Nope
2. PRINCIPALS WITH PRINCIPLES - Nope
3. MEXP ATTORNEY & OPINION LETTER ISSUER HAS CLEAN RECORD - Nope
4. TIMELY FILING OF FINANCIAL REPORTS - Nope
5. 319,999,000% INCREASE IN REVENUE - Nope
6. EX-DIVERS CASE IS IN "SMALL CLAIMS" COURT - Nope
7. EX-DIVERS LAWSUIT DROPPED - Nope
8. DECLARATION BY JAN. 1 THAT MEXP IS A SCAM - Nope
9. PERSONALLY INVITED TO BE AN OFFICIAL GSA VENDOR - Nope
10. OFFICIAL GSA MEMBER - Nope
11. ADDED REVENUE - Nope
12. MEXP BOATS SAILING - Nope
13. CYBERNETICA SHARES - Nope
14. VILLA ISABEL - Nope
15. PUTT PUTT COURSE - Nope
16. ANNOUNCE MATERIAL EVENTS - Nope
17. CASH FLOW POSITIVE - Nope
18. BURT WEBBER A PARTNER - Nope
19. RE-CREWING THE BOAT - Nope
20. PIRATE PARK - Nope
21. MANZANILLO PORT - Nope
22. PAY THE DIVERS - Nope
23. PAY RENT IN TIMELY MANNER - Nope
24. ENGAGED IN MARITIME SALVAGE - Nope
25. CONSORTIUM OF PROFESSIONALS - Nope
26. CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY - Nope
27. HAPPY SHAREHOLDERS - Nope
28. FLOAT UNDER 100 MILLION - Nope
29. UNGAGGED TA - Nope
30. REVENUE BY JANUARY 1 - Nope
31. FULLY REPORTING - Nope
32. CONSISTENTLY REPORTING ON TIME - Nope
33. CONVERTIBLE DEBT CONVERSION RATE REVEALED - Nope
34. HEALTHY BID/ASK - Nope
35. INSIDERS FREE OF FINRA VIOLATIONS - Nope
36. TWO TIME CONGRESSIONAL HONOR WINNER ANNOUNCED - Nope
37. FORTHCOMING NUMBERS ANNOUNCED - Nope
38. TRANSPARENT MANAGEMENT - Nope
39. REVENUE - Nope
40. CEO HAS CLEAN RECORD - Nope
41. CEO HAS RUN OTHER PROFITABLE PINK SHEET COMPANIES - Nope
42. SECRETARY HAS CLEAN RECORD - Nope
43. TREASURER HAS CLEAN RECORD - Nope
44. EFFICIENT MATHEMATICAL SKILLS - Nope
45. NO IMMINENT PLANS TO REVERSE SPLIT - Nope
46. 35 MILLION + ACCUMULATED DEFICIT SHOWN ON OTC REPORTS - Nope
47. MEXP WORKED ON THE CONCEPCION - Nope
48. INFORMED SHAREHOLDERS OF MEL'S CAPACITY - Nope
49. MICHAEL SCAGLIONE OUT OF PRISON - Nope
49. CANCER DETECTION KITS APPROVED BY FDA - Nope
50. CORRECT SS ON OTCMarkets - Nope

[VeronicaFox]

That technology has been around for approximately 40 years and has been dismissed as ineffective by various respected experts on the subject. In addition, it does not have FDA approval.

As a screening test, sputum cytology is not effective in decreasing mortality from lung cancer, and is an ineffective screening tool.

*Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Sputum cytology screening has been evaluated and does not appear to meet the criteria of a beneficial screening test. It appears to detect only a minority of all lung cancers, and does not appear to reduce lung cancer mortality.

*The Health Outcomes Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and the Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and the Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University, Durham, NC.