1) While paying all those attorney's fees to, as you say, "get it right," Emerald Med Farms should have asked the attorneys for an explanation, written in ordinary English, explaining what exactly makes EMF's operation legal under current California law.
Frankly, I doubt any lawyer would provide such a document in this case, because I believe it would make them complicit in a potentially criminal operation.
2) You said translated "by using this agricultural medical exception laws, laws in the law" into " We utilize the Agricultural Medical Exception (Exemption) law."
Ignoring Amato's "laws in the law" at one's own peril, I do not believe such a thing exists, this so-called "Agricultural Medical Exception (Exemption) law." Please cite it. "Cite it," btw, is legalize for "tell us what your source is" for this interpretation of the law.
I have consistently and repeatedly cited applicable laws on this board. I would love to read this "Agricultural Medical Exception (Exemption) law" for myself, and I CAN'T FIND IT.
3)"We are a Research Development Center specializing in CBD (Cannabidiol) studies specializing with Medical Doctors, as well as Scientists." Say what? How??
Emerald Med Farms is not even registered to do business in California! Yet investors are to believe that they are licensed to grow and study a controlled substance!!?! Really? Who sanctions such a Research Development Center, because I would love to call them up and ask whether Emerald Med Farms has the authorization (never mind the facilities and personnel) to do this.
4) "We are agriculturally licensed for Essential Oils and Medical procedures in the CBD world now." Where does one get such a "license"?
Here? http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/ I can't seem to find any issuer of such a license, so where is Emerald Med Farms getting such a license?
What Steve Amato actually said, as accurately as I could transcribe it: