"In the case of the G4 claims were made BEFORE necessary steps were completed. So actually the G4 has never really existed."
And who is the only person at CDEx that had the scientific knowledge to establish plausible claims in the first place?
a) Jeff Bumfield
b) Bumfield Jr.
c) Dr. Wade Poteet
d) The pizza delivery boy next store
"Just a demo mockup clobbered together in a futile attempt to attract investors and PP buyers. Seemed to work over around LUBBOCK...but nowhere else."
I was thinking that they must have purchased a COTS Raman Spectrometer which are more than capable of identifying drugs through their containers. Anything they attempt to claim beyond that like measuring the molar concentration of a drug thru a vial would be 100% pure hogus pogus.
Adventages of such a scenario:
- they would already have UL/CE certification (albeit, they're never going to put it in a hospital!)
- they'd have the RS manufacturer's technical staff available to assist in setting up a selected number of drug signatures for demos.
- the other claimed features of the instrument would be a lot easier to fake if it could actually identify a couple of drugs in they containers. The 'wow' factor they'd get from that would help tremendously in carry out any slight-of-hand deception.
- CDEx would have a device to use as evidence in their defense if the scam was busted.
Disadvantages
- With zero credit, CDEx would have had to shell out $25k - $30k for the spectrometer which is something that they would have much rather put in their pockets!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
