I think the litigation discussion is a ploy to get the pps down for cheaper shares.
I can't even find the main outcome of the non-OTC case referenced by the leader of the possible litigation. What I did find was the referenced company was initially for a $10 million claim, but settled for $1.75 million. The case was regarding misrepresentation of costs during an IPO. Definitely much different than what is being proposed for BBDA.
It's been discussed for years that BW is a crook and that BBDA is a share selling "scam." Why now litigate? The leader of the possible litigation definitely won't see what was awarded in his references. It won't help BBDA succeed.