InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lbird33

09/03/14 8:28 PM

#20485 RE: nyt #20484

You both are welcome to your own opinion I just disagree with it. The fact that you don't think there are any companies out there that wouldn't want to talk to VPLM until all patents in hand. Again, it has only been 5 months. You reference 10 years but a lot happened in that time. Like the fact they were all denied. So why would you buy a company if your not even sure all patents would be approved. The bod also knows they have more leverage when all patents in hand.



icon url

VVVVVV

09/04/14 7:53 AM

#20506 RE: nyt #20484

NYT....I believe I was more referring to acknowledging the value of the patent (s) and being so secretive about what everyone on this board has been trying to figure out; What is the company worth". Not so much, that it takes time, remember I pushed back my closing date to 2015. It's the guessing and anticipation of how these patents will be implemented to generate revenue,

The time has come (and I am sure most would agree) if they're going to monetize, then what are the projected revenues, for the remaining of 2014 and going forward. And it's nonsense that they can't tell us! I'm not buying that, nor should anyone else. This is what ever public company does. They project revenue,etc. And to tell your shareholders that it's worth what anyone is willing to pay them, is ridiculous, to say the least.. Insulting and disrespectful. It's as stupid as telling your shareholders, they don't care about the share price. Be real. No shareholder wants to hear that.

They're ways to answer the question, trust me.

Give us something and most of all, give us respect. And to side with some of the bashers on this board, I can understand where your coming from. But, I do have faith is what they have and believe there is tremendous value here.

Tuesday's conference call is their time to shine. Let's see if they can step up to the plate and give us what we all want to hear. And, I am sure most would agree. IMHO