Replies to post #28148 on ParaFin Corporation (PFNO)

[lambchops]

Well, good points are made by those posts by Janice Shell. It's just that it is old information. Often current info has a different point-of-view like that of Grifter_24.

I had determined thru my banking contacts well before others the bonds were issued. I reviewed the forensic information well in advance and figured out there was a better than average chance the evidence pointed to the bonds being on the right paper, etc.

Now, with funding, PFNO won't be ignored. ING will have to settle or fight in a European court against PFNO. Since they were issued, IMO, to illegal foreign entities outside Germany (perhaps Iran for oil money), the question in my mind is if Sid can actually prove ownership. And, that's where. IMO, ING will attack him in court or decide to settle if they don't want further damage to its reputation.

[janice shell]

Beg pardon? I never quoted LaPorte in any of the PFNO articles I wrote.

[janice shell]

And of course I don't work for ING. My only contact with them was brief. I wrote to them asking about Sid's "bonds", and they wrote back telling me the securities were fake, and explained why.