A little bit of unbiased views on the STLK situation~
"To be fair...I have not looked at the previous filings BUT the cashflow statement for the quarter ended June 30 shows NEW net borrowings of $90,000 to cover their net cash use in operations of $82,000.
...and the two new notes have rather toxic conversion features. So whether or not they are just a conversion of an existing liability...the $60K...it went from conversion at market to a 58% discount to the lowest average 3 day price over 10 trading days...that is toxic and they still needed to borrow an additional $90K in the quarter.
Against that backdrop, the issue of how the convertible notes are represented as new debt or not is almost immaterial. "