InvestorsHub Logo

Tim May

08/30/14 4:44 PM

#136055 RE: Elmer Phud #136054

Maybe, but GloFo is licensing the process from Samsung (not a good sign to license a cutting-edge process; better than not having it at all, but usually a sign of technical or financial weakness).

http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1321974

"Samsung qualified its 14 nm process in February and has multiple customer chips in production in hopes of volume shipments by the end of the year. GlobalFoundries will qualify the process this year and provide volume production in early 2015."

A look at this estimate (it's the Wikipedia, so beware) of fabs is illuminating:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_semiconductor_fabrication_plants

It shows Malta (New York) as GloFo's 28 nm fab, versus multiple fabs from Intel in the process nodes of interest going forward. Ditto for Samsung and TSMC.

We've been hearing that Leixlip (Ireland) is having problems transferring the process and so will be retaining 360 workers from Israel to assist. (http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-intel-transferring-360-israeli-employees-to-ireland-1000955037)

Perhaps Samsung will similarly be sending hundreds of Koreans to upstate New York.

Of course the experiences described here may not apply to the Samsung/GloFo transfer. Lots of things could be different. But I think it bears watching for signs of slippage. And, in any case, it's one site, not the 3 sites (Hillsboro, Chandler) plus maybe Leixlip in the next year or two (from the news article above about the 24 month assignment : "The employees have been told they will be required to remain in Ireland for 12-24 months.")


--Tim May

fastpathguru

09/02/14 1:44 AM

#136076 RE: Elmer Phud #136054

Updated: Did I not tell you all that Elmer is the true addict?

Whatever... The worse he makes AMD look, the worse Intel looks for being suckered into paying $6B to preserve DELL's AMD-virginity.

fpg

Edit: WOW, funny how borusa is being blamed for bringing up the subject, when clearly, Elmer (prompted by Tim) relaunched the topic with his Yet Another Attempt To Whitewash Intel's Image By Bashing AMD... Go ahead, show me the upstream post by the AMD booster that triggered him.

Edit #2: In the world outside this choir Elmer preaches to - "We prefer to wait and see the outcome of the appeal as the public has already tried and convicted Intel over the issue, so further damage to its brand name will be limited." - http://finance.yahoo.com/news/intel-contests-1-4b-antitrust-173002357.html