Interesting!
These authors may or may not have some connection to Spiber (JP).
This paper describes an investigation that seems to duplicate the work done by the university researchers associated with KBLB and published in the PNAS article more than a year ago.
As KBLB / UND already has patent protection for this process, it is unlikely that any commercial venture will come from this research.
Remember that to publish a scientific paper one only needs to satisfy the journal editors and reviewers that the work is sufficiently novel and significant to be worth publication.
When it is work done by Japanese researchers at a Japanese facility and funded by the Japan government such barriers to publication in a Japanese Journal are significantly lowered.
Regarding tensile strength improvement. The numbers quoted in this paper for the best samples are very similar to the numbers given in the PNAS paper. (TS of spider drag line silk = 200% that of standard Bombyx mori silk, TS of transgenic silk =150%)
It is likely that KBLB's current MS is better than that but numbers have not been specifically stated.
KBLB's BR has been stated to be near 200%.
Conclusion:
A well written article about a good, if unoriginal, research project, But KBLB / UND / UW hold the patents on this process and product and exclusive licenses for the use of much better and more versatile tools than those used by these researchers.
Mike L.