LOLO, Cotchett himself told me shortly after the 2/23 hearing that Kramer refused to grant the Rambus motion to modify the existing protective order - & that the docs could not be used outside the AT case. (I do seem to recall discussion about Kramer willing to relook at the issue after 30 days, or some such.)
The only way to reconcile all of this is to ASSUME Kramer "entered and continued" the Rambus motion w/o denying it, then considered the Rambus motion along with the banditos' motion on 4/4. I don't recall if the 2/23 minutes can/would back up that construct.
As I posted a few minutes ago, the minutes of 4/4 that Kramer issued (that docrew posted this evening) are VERY STRANGE.
Oh well.
smd
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
