It would be absurd NOT to compare. I was comparing time NOT revenue of netflix. First of all Netflix had an established NATIONWIDE mail order rental subscription service so your point about their revenues is MOOT because NTEK doesn't have this type of service. Second those revenues you posted was before Netflix EVER began streaming so all that revenue was from their MAIL ORDER SERVICE so how is that relevant in ANY WAY shape or form?
We are talking about streaming and the logistics of such. What I was comparing was how long it took Netflix content to get to where it is today. That is the point I was making and it is COMPLETELY relevant.
It's important to look at all aspects. ESPECIALLY the timing of obtaining content and how long it takes to get a good library. To completely IGNORE THAT would be absurd. Thanks for the info tho. It is unfortunately irrelevant to my argument however.
In 2003 they had 1.4 million subscribers. ULTRAFLIX is anticipating 1 million within 1 year with 4K. $6 per subscription time 1 million users equal $6 million per month and $72 million in a year. Get the fact. This is just a start for ULTRAFLIX. Netflix didn't have the best movies when they started till after 3 years they launched the service and started acquiring more movies with the revenue. Get it right.
Netflix started in 1999. Get the facts. The balance sheet you pulled out is from 2006 which is 6 years after their service launched lol. Get the facts.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
