I say that Schissler's agreement is BETTER than Pritt's because Pritt got 25M shares (250K @ 1¢) but the pps had already tanked; so he only received 65K (selling @ .0026)
QUITE A DEAL!!!
Meanwhile, Schissler opted to get paid monthly, with a conversion rate that varies with the pps... He receives a smaller amount of shares each month (that's easier to sell) and as you already pointed out...
Whether the pps goes up or down, he will still come out of this with about $250K... UNLIKE PRITT!!!
Lets see...250k versus 65K??? I think most people would say that is the "better" deal...but lets wait for the final tallies in the Q's, eh???
As for this...
I proved that this "ceiling" means the lender will get MORE shares than they would with out it ...if the pps goes UP... YOUR CLAIM is that it means the pps WILL GO UP and they will be converting at 1¢ or above...I guess we will wait until the Q's following the conversion; and see which scenario proves to be TRUE... ...As well as the other claims you've made recently...like IronRidge will only get 381M more shares, or (better yet) they will be RETURNING 435m shares!!!