Replies to post #15320 on Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[buffalop51]

"Invisible" and "flying under the radar" is a defense mechansim for lousy performance IMO.

There is not an infinite number of publicly traded companies. With all the analysts, fund managers, etc. compared to the number of publicly traded companies? The ratio is absolutely MINISCULE.

They are paid to know about the prospects of EVERY publicly traded company.

As far as 'they can't invest in sub dollar or OTCBB companies' is yet another defense mechanism for IMSC's poor performance. Look at CRVW. A OTCBB stock with 25% ownership by Investment Managers, 25% ownership by Strategic Entities, and 50% retail. It trades at .56 cents!

This BS about flying under the radar, invisible is BS. People need to understand that the STREET has weighed IMSC's prospects. Investors, including myself, thought Air Cargo was IT! We were ALL wrong.

So now it's checkpoint? The street knows, they don't believe in the story. The were absolutely correct for air cargo. We were ALL wrong.

Bolduc has some SERIOUS explaining to do, and undoubtedly why the potential lawsuit was launched. What is the real story Mr. Bolduc? Tell your investors. You either totally incompetent or not telling investors the truth. There is no other explaination for what you have put your investors through.

With the last paragraph of my post? I think the street agrees with me. PERIOD. Sign the complaint, IMO. This BS has gone on for FAR too long. PERIOD.

[Pat]

I think you underestimate the breadth of research done by analysts. If it's traded, analysts have looked at it. If an analyst gets "surprised" by a company that breaks out, I would imagine that he/she would be equally surprised by the pink slip from their employer for their failure to satisfactorily perform their job.

I think that explanations consisting of "analyst's shortcomings", "short sellers", and "manipulators" are often offered as rationalizations to explain investor discontent or disappointment ... not always but often enough.

It just strikes me that sufficient information is now available for the market to anticipate whether this is going to be a stock that has the probability of significant share price appreciation.

Estimated revenue numbers are discussed on this forum. Assume for a moment that they are accurate. Analysts would also know these numbers. They would then look at the likelihood of whether these final TSA administrative requirements will occur in a fashion such that IMSC will be the primary beneficiary. If they are, that is ENORMOUS for a company like this.

That analysis has likely already happened. Once again, that begs the question that bothers me. Why has there not been a dramatic increase in the share price if everything is on track for IMSC? Or perhaps another question .... Has the outcome of the final administrative hurdles already been priced into the share price?

I understand that these are rhetorical questions and no one knows the answer. We only have opinions at this point. But the answer to these two questions are going to make a big difference in all of our financial happiness with IMSC!


Pat