Replies to post #15551 on Fannie Mae Preferred S (FNMAS)

[rosen62]

And that's the point. Read my posts. The Judge warned the government at the end -it's in the transcript- to not hide documents that will answer the question whether the FHFA is the United States or not. How hard will it be to find these documents? Now that they know exactly what to hide, how hard will it be?

The discovery process has been narrowed in time and in scope. If you simply change the dates of some documents they will instantly fall out of reach. That hard.

It is not that plaintiff has full access to all hard drives and all office documents as if they were the FBI raiding FHFA headquarters. Plaintiff relies on documents provided by the government. Documents that seek to incriminate both the FHFA and Treasury.

[Donotunderstand]

Zargis

Yes Yes and No

Yes we are trying to show we belong in that court

To do so we need to show this is GOV and GOV (and not GOV and private sector) --- or maybe we are trying to show no independence of FNMA so its a single part GOV action

But we got dicovery to find such documents as we do not have most of the key papers (we have some near smoking gunS)but not all

I would suggest we are hoping that in that process of proving we belong in this court (FHFA is the GOV or indeed one and the same as TRESURY) --- that documents about when the GOV thought FNMA was doing good will appear ........... and documents about motives of actions will appear

So yes and yes - but the search could well find ONE document so embarrassing (daming) of the gov that we slide right into third