InvestorsHub Logo

flptrnkng

08/20/14 8:14 AM

#271848 RE: Roth_IRA_3000 #271847

Rather than build the organization to fabricate, install, operate and maintain processors, PTOI management made a decision to utilize an existing organizations capability.



So they blew through $64,000,000 working a business plan for 5 years and just now they decide to ditch it for Plan B?

Nice :)

fourkids_9pets

08/20/14 9:52 AM

#271857 RE: Roth_IRA_3000 #271847

the irony is some of us (P2O investors) actually wanted this outcome

as many know i had an analyst friend look at P2O's
business model .. and that was their advice to me


this is the joy of this national firm's decades of experience

interesting to note mgmt's execution since March of this year

CFO hired (one third of 150k salary in stock .. 50,000 = 500,000 shares)
dolt (sec) compliant at an expense of $285,000 for 2013's K alone
NYSDEC 5 and 10 year permits >> clearly recognizing P2O's *viability*
Finra's change out of P2O's name/ticker/cusip


and now via the public domain for all who've done their DD

we have this national co. with *decades* of leverage >> that can't be impugned


*entity* (snicker) took PTOI *too low* >> they are desperate to PROtect
very specific price points

speaking of reaping what is sown ;)

(60 to 66M shares in PTOI's float last 18 months) and over 57M
re: *volume* Feb 2013 to July 2014

the *entity* (snicker) clearly understood what the hiring of the CFO in March 2014 meant

and it's why *reset volume* backed off so that April and July
had 2 of the lowest *trades* since 2010 (4 years)

*entity* (snicker) rigged the game from the get go .. mgmt's execution re: P2O
makes them pay up re: PTOI


4kids
all jmo