A Directory with Eleventy Billion other websites? :(
SEEK DOES NOT NEED UMPTEEN AMOUNTS OF WEBSITES
FROM A CUSTOMERS STAND POINT, DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE A NORMAL PERSON WOULD NEED 6,000 DIFFERENT WEBSITES TO USE? LOL. NOW THINGS WOULD BE EASIER IF EVERYTHING WAS ROLLED INTO ONE WEBSITE NAME, CORRECT?
Take the Yellow Pages for instance. Isn't there one site? They don't have YellowNewYork, YellowTexas etc.
I thought the whole premise of the word Directory.....is that most if not all of Scott's sites could be accessed from TheDirectory.com?
Hello this, hello that is cool and all. But IMO a lot of the websites feel too similar. As a cost cutting move why not just have fewer sites
Or is the number of sites a share selling tactic? Quantity over a Quality? I am not sure what Scott has more of right now....Outstanding Shares.....or Websites that a lot of IMO are very similar.
As far as all of those Hello sites. Couldn't Scott just have users type in their city from TheDirectory.com and bring up a city specific website?
Perhaps Scott should simplify and consolidate....?