Replies to post #10582 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[As I See It]

I hope this is STWA's way of saying, look guys we are very tightly bound by an NDA. But, in prior tests:

According to analysis of data compiled from both laboratory simulations and installation on pipeline equipment by the U.S. Department of Energy, Temple University and STWA officials, viscosity reduction outcomes were sufficient to "reliably increase throughput and/or a reduction in back pressure and power consumption," an effect attributed to less resistance and turbulence in the pipe and a lower pressure threshold needed to operate the line. Results from multiple tests demonstrated that operational efficiencies achieved "could reasonably be expected to measurably lower carbon or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the operation of the pipeline."

And now, in the present time:

"We're very pleased with the progress we're making in the commercialization of AOT, particularly as the energy industry increases its focus on, and level of investment in, clean tech solutions

And finally:

"By enabling our customers to possibly rein in the amount of energy they use to run pumping stations and the power needed to transport each barrel of oil, AOT holds the potential to contribute meaningfully to the oil and gas industry's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through more energy efficient, environmentally sound transport of crude from well hole to market."

Old news, yes, but retold with the knowledge of what is happening today. Not the most definitive pronouncement, but maybe it's all that they can say.