couldn't have said it better myself, back2basics - well put.
10bagger, i CERTAINLY agree with you, as most would, that there are a TON of questions about GFCI. there is no doubt about that. i view it as appropriate for a small speculation. i still have no idea what will happen with GFCI down the road.
but i still have no idea why you have made your pet project to bash GFCI. it really is a J+H thing, as back2basics points out.
i learned early on to always be humble in the face of the market. it can very quickly pull the rug out from under, just when you think you've got things all figured out. a lesson in this could have been learned when *the very day* after you gloated and preened with your 8 (i counted) posts in a few hour span when GFCI bottomed out at .115, it promptly started a big run upwards the next day, almost tripling from bottom to peak.
there was a lesson to be learned in that sequence of events, don't you think?
i am an avid reader of dr. jeckyll's posts, but i still have no idea about the mr. hyde act. i have NO problem with people pointing out bad things about GFCI, i could rattle off quite a few myself, despite my speculation in them. but - back2basics is completely right imho that some of your posts are out of line for someone of your stature on the VM board: the down a nickel/cleverrox one included. it was baseless and unnecessary. and now i see you have a new "these guys should go to jail" thesis out, nice.