InvestorsHub Logo

Capt_Smith77

08/03/14 2:43 PM

#8883 RE: Siggy3 #8882

It's just more proof that the deal or terms with Martha were bad from the beginning.

EDIT:

They can't even make their standard royalty payment to Martha and yet some believe that the PPS should be .30.

RobinIV

08/03/14 4:20 PM

#8884 RE: Siggy3 #8882

Thank you very much for posting - I had not noticed this part. Hope they know what they're doing. It's a shame we're left in the dark about their strategy.

stayfocused

08/04/14 4:22 AM

#8887 RE: Siggy3 #8882

This is one of the reasons why I urged everyone to read the registration, there's some revealing info in there for those who wanna read it.

"We need to continue to raise funds to cover working capital and for other financial requirements until we are able to raise revenues to a point of positive cash flow. In this regard, we note that we were not able to make the payment that was due July 1, 2014 to Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia pursuant to our license agreement. While we are in discussions to work out terms of payment, we most likely will need to raise additional funds to meet our obligations under the license agreement. We plan to raise additional funds, as before, through additional equity or debt financings. We may not be able to raise such funds on terms acceptable to us or at all. Financings may be on terms that are dilutive or potentially dilutive to our stockholders. If sources of financing are insufficient or unavailable, we will be required to modify our operating plans to the extent of available funding or curtail or suspend operations."

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=63120499&symbol=NRTI