InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Threes

07/31/14 8:20 AM

#184803 RE: cheynew #184800

Probably because they are lawyers and every phone call , form, and manipulations adds to there monthly billing.
Just soaking the client a little bit more.
icon url

Frustrated

07/31/14 8:24 AM

#184804 RE: cheynew #184800

8am has come and gone again today with another day of no news. According to the 2009 newbie updated list a partnership for Bavi and/or Cotara could happen any day. Looks like not today. Also looks like another Lung cancer conference will come and go with no word from pphm. All imo.
icon url

bigdumbandugly

07/31/14 9:07 AM

#184806 RE: cheynew #184800

i'm not a lawyer nor do i play one on tv (i gotta live with myself after all), but i'd say this is your garden variety stall tactic - which seems to have been in play in this case throughout.

why the 14 day?
icon url

4OurRetirement

07/31/14 9:29 AM

#184811 RE: cheynew #184800

Morning cheynew, your link doesn't seem to work:-(
icon url

skweze

07/31/14 10:27 AM

#184822 RE: cheynew #184800

It looks like they are requesting a transcript of the hearing since the court reporter is referenced. Good question as to why. There is no decision on the Motion For Summary Judgement posted yet. Pure conjecture, but maybe the judge ruled against them and is still drafting his opinion. I'm not a lawyer, but wouldn't a transcript be ordered in conjunction with an appeal? Can they even appeal a Motion For Summary Judgment that is partial in nature (validity of alleged limited liability clause) and simply not granted, i.e, not a final order? Could they make a Motion For Reconsideration? Maybe the lawyers on the board can comment.


Still no decision on CSM motion. This was filed yesterday. Unless I misunderstand (not unusual) I don't understand why defendant's attorney would be asking the court for a transcript of their own filing.