longy, (sigh), or for goodness sakes, yes, it is what I said. The whole point of all my posts centered around the fact that Calkin and everyone else are taking shares of the company instead of cash because the company can't afford to pay them a salary, yet -- they don't have enough money to pay them. That's it longy. Nothing more. Nothing less. I never said it was bad to take shares in lieu of cash. They all do that. It's what happens in the years that follow, to those issued shares. What do they do with them? If you've been doing this for any length of time, you already know the answer - and it's not good. For now we wait and see, and hope Calkin does the right thing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
