InvestorsHub Logo

salgovernale69

07/24/14 4:03 PM

#18587 RE: ahab333 #18586

Exactly HCIT. If Pierce presented something that was anywhere close to overwhelming data that they can truly turn non-responders into responders, you'd think they would be shouting it from the mountain tops. It's interesting that they are staying close lipped. That's all.

twiz0019

07/24/14 4:07 PM

#18588 RE: ahab333 #18586

Hey cow, I don't think you will get any disagreement from anybody here about your view. It really is quite mind boggling. As long as they keep releasing positive data, our day will come. Hopefully a lot sooner than later!

trading.jeff

07/24/14 4:11 PM

#18589 RE: ahab333 #18586

You are 100% correct. However, one thing you left out is that most people won't touch an OTC stock no matter what it is and this is the case with $ONCS. This is probably why it's at the price it's at, despite its potential for changing paradigms re: cancer treatment. Are people aware of OncoSec? I believe that more people are aware of it than one would think. If they are aware of it, why aren't they climbing aboard? This brings us back to the OTC "stigma."

If the FDA sees fit to approve OncoSec's methods, there will be a bandwagon affect, stigma or no stigma, which will move $ONCS's pps up to levels it's never been in.

JMO.