InvestorsHub Logo

usma67korea

07/24/14 1:01 PM

#1449 RE: finvestor #1448

Bull
i enjoy your posts here and even in SUMR where i have a lot of shares.

but i do wonder why is this article having such a devastating effect on pps? i am amazed. it is CLEAR he is just a small timer, one individual, yet has caused 200M drop in Market cap.

to me, it clearly shows that this company needs professional coverage in the USA (not HK) and needs to be more involved w/ the investor community - not pumping but constant communication on facts and development.

until it happens, the whip saw volatility is here to stay. traders prob love it, but it scares me to death.

i prefer SUMR. i hold 100K shares there waiting for a 5-6 range

bullmarket2222

07/25/14 7:00 AM

#1454 RE: finvestor #1448

Yesterday I had an article in at SA for publication that I had submitted for inclusion at 3am. This after I had spent the prior 8 hours working on it.



At 7am, I received a notice from SA that they were declining to publish my article because I was to “harsh” on the attack writer. They said it was ok to attack companies, but not ok to attack other SA authors. (I reminded them of Pearson going after me. They ignored this in the return email) So for the next several hours I modified and resubmitted. Twice. Last night they declined it again Here is a copy and paste of the last rejection:



“Arthur, You applied none of the previous feedback. You insult the person for the first half of the article, and don't address the investment.”


After this rejection, I decided the message as I wrote it was too important as written and I was not going to “bend over” for this, obviously short seller lover editor any longer and instead put the article up this morning as a Seeking Alpha Instiblog. BTW, what I posted is the last version, so you can imagine what the first looked like But more important is the message.


For those who don't know, while it may look the same on the SA website, the difference is the Instiblog is not subject to SA editing. The big difference is the instiblog is not published for syndication.


I expect it will get some coverage from other chat boards and tweets, but not as much as it might have otherwise. Feel free to share the link and article with any of your friends that might either be a bit queasy about the recent hard drop or are opportunists getting in or more of the stock before it takes off again.


Kandi Tech: The Real Truth About China's Currently Uncontested #1 Pure EV Developer
Jul 25, 2014 4:43 AM | about stocks: KNDI

Contrary to some with an "agenda" KNDI's Financials are clean, clear and informative to anyone with basic knowledge who takes the time to actually read them.
KNDI sell its EV Products in a similar way that TSLA sells it Powertrains and Battery's to its Strategic Partners, Toyota and Daimler
KNDI's infrequent battery sales are done with a profit in a clear and easily understood way
KNDI share of EV revenues for both CarShare and Lease programs is disproportionally higher by as much as 90% over its JV partner
Don't believe the above? Then read on for supported facts, not opinions and learn why KNDI .

bullmarket2222

07/25/14 8:09 AM

#1457 RE: finvestor #1448

I believe you have the facts now with the screenshot and him tearing down his website. He also didn't disclose Asending capital and the tearing down of the website certainly proves he wants to hide information.

He's obviously a crook.

BULL