InvestorsHub Logo

moojer

07/23/14 12:29 PM

#140857 RE: jfburk #140856

The pertinent questions that have been raised is why Scott keeps putting out misleading PRs over the last 6+ years, fails at accomplishing them and never follows up with shareholders on why he keeps failing. Relying on a 50 year old report that can't be verified by current standards is non-sense. If there were "so called" billions of assets in the ground, financiers would be lining up to move his project forward. Their conspicuous absence says all you need to know. After Scott's pinkie tactics, shareholders are left holding the stinkie bag and humorously touting that it takes as long as it takes and my grandkids might see it get mined. LOL!!!

passthegravy

07/23/14 12:33 PM

#140859 RE: jfburk #140856

Exactly!

Tar sands

07/23/14 12:39 PM

#140860 RE: jfburk #140856

It would be hard to believe that there is anyone, other than a small select group, who believe that Sarissa is a "big" Company. The general belief seemingly is that it is a penny stock Company without an Office, without a Website, no known employees with a group of "executives" with titles and positions. The "rock in the ground" is worthless unless it can be extracted profitably. Talk about it being worth Billions is extremely misleading. It simply isn t. The Company is barely operational as an entity yet alone as a Mining concern.

Substantial funding can solve many issues however to attract the money one needs to have a viable Business. That does not exist at present. Any Investor demands a reasonable expectation of not only recovering their investment but also realizing a profit. Sarissa is simply not positioned to provide that expectation as it is now presented.

It is not a matter of "nay sayers" being negative - it is simply looking at the Business facts which presents the reality.

dmbao

07/23/14 12:59 PM

#140865 RE: jfburk #140856

Depends present management has not yet shown the competence do bring the project to that point.

They may or they like previous owners of the asset fail.

I still think there is hope but I am not at all impressed by the operations or communication of the present team.

All the issues are easily addressed including the $ if they start to do things differently.