you can't have dual listing
if they voluntarily de-listed then the deletion from NASDAQ is obvious, my point is that NASDAQ did not de-list them it was voluntary if NEWL did not act by July 17th for the hearing then NASDAQ would have de-listed NEWL, the hearing was for July 24th which did not happen.
I take as bit of offense someone on this board (not yourself) calling me a "newbie" and saying to have some humility in my response to another member when I was making a clarification to misinformation and the protocol NASDAQ follows, and with simple logic knowing this information can come to a logic conclusion of how this was de-listed.
regardless it does not help the situation for shareholders