InvestorsHub Logo

jay14

07/22/14 2:13 AM

#10247 RE: 4retire #10246

Really Bill LLOLs, you posted While I hope it works and TMMI can gain traction, giving it a value of 1,043% to 2,086% of current value is just PUMPING with no basis of fact to support it. Both you and Picker know this, yet you pump away, trying to create your own headline. Who's pumping as you have indicated.All I see is enthusiasts, if the shoe was on the other foot, you and all other bashers would be praising the efforts of the company that you support as well.In fact you have, go back and read some of your older posts!!. We are believers, followers of TMM,Inc.
We don't need to create our own headlines, that will be happening on its own. All I hear is Sour Grapes in the posts from you and others and nothing more.Why don't you guys go and start your own message board, if you don't like what you read!!. You and the others, rather just sit and wait on this message board and badger the new/old TMMI investors, because you guys are jealous of what has happen with "The Company" and their research program with Raytheon.Bill, you really don't know the whole story.How could you, unless you met Larry Panik and Bruce Hoyt back in the early 90s;Did you?.The real truth will be told and the final chapter of this story will end, and not in a pretty way for the Defendants.They might squeeze by this lawsuit but, that codec will be shelved, it's a copy that was updated while the programmers who were working on the codec in question, were still in contact with DFI/TMM/DFMI and a new agenda was put forth with your chums.Heck, you support them and you got screwed in 2000, unless you were given a promise note for your shares as a trade in value towards the new agenda, which turned out to be Dimension,Inc.You have always said you had to buy 1 share to attend some private meeting, how much or how many shares of TMMI did it cost you?.Larry Panik held the proxy on close to 15 million shares in 2000..
This current court case, is a dispute involving certain intellectual property rights wherein TMM, Inc. ( TMMI ) and Digital Focus, Inc. ( DFI ) (collectively Plaintiffs ) are suing Lawrence Panik, Dimension, Inc., Digital Focus Media, Inc. ( DFMI ), Bruce Hoyt, Lyman Hurd, and John Elton (collectively Defendants ) for: (1) Conversion; (2) Defamation of Title; (3) Misappropriation of Trade Secrets; (4) Intentional Interference with Contract; (5) Intentional Interference with Contract; and (6) Unfair Competition. TMMI' rights from the 1993 agreement were not extinguished by the 1996 agreement because the 1996 agreement was unrelated to the 1993 agreement.Enough said!!.
TMMI TRUDEF moves onward and upward Worldwide!!.