I do not understand you guys, data, especially data that held up for seven years is valuable. If it were not valuable, it would not have been suppressed. It would have been laid out there, for you to evaluate up front.
GC made a BIG deal about this retrospective study, which was not retrospective, and kept trumpeting it, and you kept saying cool, here comes a great study, because your guru said here it comes, but he wants it his way, which is totally wrong and not the standard way.
Also, GC made a big deal about the Version 2 Lympro. Well, everyone thought that was the new Lympro, it would be greater than sliced bread, well, these are the results of the new Lympro test, which was new seven years ago.
Does anyone have any judgement here?
Do not trust me, or GC, have someone who you trust evaluate the numbers, and see what they say.
Seriously, this is your money.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
