Replies to post #104968 on Amarantus Bioscience Holdings Inc (AMBS)

[christjamin]

Something is weird in all this. You bring people's observation/article but chose to draw conclusion different from the authors conclusions. Never heard of. How do you call that? I feel you are trying to destroy this company, their product? Are you being paid by someone to do so? What is/are your agenda(s). They are not hidden anymore but we need to know the motivations? Get in the ambs stock at lower prices? Just say it and we see how we can help you fulfill that goal. Are you working for competitors who seek destruction of AMBS? There must be a rationale in your posts. Please explain. Your intentions don't seem to provide/shed light, cause you would have just provided info and let people draw their own conclusions. Instead you bring info and skew the conclusion in a different direction that the authors intended. May god help you in your agenda.. amen..

[orion1983]

Yes...for no suprise it seems to be no coincidence that Lympro & Elto were gained for no money (compared to these screaming of being a "multi-million-$$$-drug" each). However, these pseudo-pipeline let AMBS survive quite a while and MANF is now quite a bit closer to first applications in humans. However, all that Lympro hype towards a conference (and then to another conference) with all this twitter-junk is just PR IMHO.

However, this Lympro-stuff/expectations still seems to fuel the PPS at some point. Thus, it works for AMBS and also for flippers or longs investing in the single digits...

A very crucial question concerning MANF really is if their patent "only" covers (i) MANF as an in vitro pre-produced compound, or also (ii) MANF regulation/transcriptiontranslation/folding or something like that (which I really doubt). I am also not convinced that the MANF patent will not be brougt to court again, especially when it DOES become a blockbuster drug.

[myersvodka]

This not confirmed by ambs and must be removed.

[myersvodka]

All post not official been proved by Amarantus must be removed. Your statements are pure speculation and one sided leaving out statements from GC to confirm your ramblings

[Rosym]

That statement refers to the MJFF interpretation of the study they helped support of MANF in PD

Sound good for MANF! I think MJFF help a little for MANF.