Replies to post #115709 on SPO Networks Inc (SPOI)

[Johnny4profits]

WHAT CONSTITUTES MISINFORMATION? "HUGE"!

In five years, the DOD information
appears to me the most credible yet.
However, it will be a long haul to profitability even if ever there is some government contract. Testing means only that. Passing testing and then getting a contract is something else again. I'd suggest that there are other concerns vying for this same business, perhaps ones with patents and/or at least a track record of some credibility.

On top of that, it appears that the agreements may end up being with AHS, a private company 50% owned by HTI (HLNT), which includes 50% of the AHS debt and 100% of the HTI debt. Delta came to town, HTI closed their doors, and it all leaves me wondering what if anything does AHS need with a public company if they have a DOD contract in hand.

I'm not saying that a good pump may not be in the making here, it wouldn't be the first time, just that it is going to take a really good bit of news to turn the tide of five years of BS in the making. I don't find anything of slight misinterpretation in any of the HTI ramblings since the SSEV days. Legal actions continue, dilution continues, and apparently insiders are managing to hold the PPS at an imaginary value.

The public record, that which has not been erased of recent, shows the folly all too well. Those whom kept copies of stuff or have placed the old rhetoric and HTI Newsletter banter on the boards may find much of what has been stated, now appearing as misinformation IMO. A reasonable person would have to think or suspect or admit that HTI has been an example of amateur business venture or an intentional long and longing con.

Johnny,

A slight misinterpretation of the information provided by HLNT cannot be construed as misinformation by HLNT.

Some statements by HLNT lend credibility to the testing. The 100 hour 'burn in' is a recommended service interval by John Deere on commissioning new units.

Mikey & JJJ,

I am not a morning person and may have come off a bit harsh. My apologies.

I think I was more frustrated at the size than anything. 3kW generators, to the Army, are pretty much disposable. Two 30kW TQG unis (brand new) puts the minimum cost of testing at ~$100k. This is contingent on the use of new generators, which some HLNT statements seem to support.

I've been here a while and plan on hanging out to see the big up or down.

DOES HTI STILL HAVE A PO BOX?

.