InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chipguy

03/29/06 9:05 PM

#3400 RE: chipdesigner #3398

Yes, I believe wbmw called for 1.8GHz QC as a "realistic" estimate.

At 90 nm or 65 nm? Or perhaps you don't think AMD will
have 65 nm parts ready for Cray by 2008?

icon url

wbmw

03/30/06 12:25 PM

#3419 RE: chipdesigner #3398

Re: Yes, I believe wbmw called for 1.8GHz QC as a "realistic" estimate. Wrong again. What a surprise!

As usual, I can prove that you are lying.

I called for nothing faster than 2.2GHz for 90nm, and a starting frequency of 2.66GHz for 65nm QC.

#msg-9751056
#msg-9688288

So if all AMD can do by 2008 is enable 2.6GHz quad core, they are coming in quite a bit *below* my expectations.