Replies to post #94068 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Rawnoc]

He's meant it's irrelevant to the correct argument that the so-called science hasn't been proven scientifically so it's laughable to claim otherwise.

It's irrelevant if it was a strategic decision or not to the fact that this remains an extremely highly speculative investment requiring blind trust from the "trust us" management because there is no science to evaluate. There is just mouth.

[JG36]

I did not say it was irrelevant that NNVC has not published peer reviewed papers. I said that why NNVC has not published peer reviewed papers is irrelevant. I was responding to a post that claimed that NNVC has proven science, which it does not. There may be legitimate reasons why NNVC has not published its results, but that just means that there are legitimate reasons why NNVC does not have proven science, it does not mean that the science is proven.