InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Tradeinman

07/10/14 3:16 PM

#52383 RE: sweetums #52382

So, I say something like that, not nearly as outraged, and I take heat?

Sweetums says it and there isn't a peep?

Yes sweetums, I am beginning to lean more in the outraged column.

Have a good one!
icon url

jjphillips

07/10/14 3:27 PM

#52386 RE: sweetums #52382

Lol, have fun wasting the SEC's time.

You do know this is a penny stock, right? It's a penny for a reason. There's quite a bit of risk that sh*t won't work out right. They got the mine up and running, but their plan to turn that into revenues simply didn't work. That does NOT make it a scam. By your gorilla logic, every company that went busto is a scam. That's simply not true.

They're very transparent in their filings with respect to where all the dilution is coming from. The risk was apparent. If they couldn't get funds together to deal with the convertibles, the current situation was bound to happen.

It's good that the company sets a timeline of late 2014, but you should be more realistic and realize that this is an aggressive timeline. Is this company a scam and a failure if the mill isn't operational until Q1 2015?
icon url

copperslash

07/10/14 3:39 PM

#52392 RE: sweetums #52382

According to your inside information? really?
Did your insider tell you what the mill components will be?
If not, how did you determine the length of time to establish the mill without knowing the components?
We have 5 months to the end of the year.
Just about any mill can be established in 5 months.
icon url

bontooth

07/13/14 3:57 PM

#52454 RE: sweetums #52382

I guess you told us.

btw . . good luck with the SEC.


. . . doesn't matter if you aren't producing. Ask my ex wife!



crying shame your ex-wife isn't producing. take her to a snake doctor, in Nevada . .