InvestorsHub Logo

Snowy_Owl

07/05/14 1:19 PM

#93667 RE: davidc2 #93665

'davidc2', A rule in politics, business, and the jungle is that persons of PT's caliber are not worthy of a line by line or word by word response.

A blanket statement informing the readers that the article was not accurate is sufficient. Anything beyond that is for the courts.

SA may have won the big "PT vs NNVC" battle but they also lost a little. Each time SA gets embroiled in these stunts they tend a smell little worse and become less of a trusted source.

Any attempt to promote the judges ruling on speech as a validation of the article's content is laughably foolish.



loanranger

07/05/14 4:05 PM

#93672 RE: davidc2 #93665

"It clearly appears that they are more interested at finding the identity of the author to determine where the leaks are coming from?"

What leaks?