I'm so confused by the fact that I believe the Plaintiff's lawyer stated that in the Defendant's response to the discovery demands, that the Plaintiff could simply go to the Nevada Secretary of State and to the new Transfer Agent company to get some of the info and documents the Plaintiff was seeking (such as the current Exobox Articles of Inc, current Exobox Bylaws, and current EXBX stock share counts as well as the current EXBX issued share certificates info).
We'll guess what? I'm pretty sure the Plaintiff's lawyer took the Defendant's advise. Sheez !! Not sure what to say..
But to add to what was just posted, I believe the exact verbiage states:
"I declare under penalty of perjury that the reinstatement has been authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction or by the duly elected board of directors of the entity or if the entity has no board of directors, its equivalent of such board.
I declare, to the best of my knowledge under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is correct and acknowledge that pursuant to NRS 239.330, it is a category C felony to knowingly offer any false or forged instrument for filing in the Office of the Secretary of State."
Can anyone here describe to me what it means when it states "the duly elected board of directors of the entity"?
Does Exobox have a "duly elected board of directors"? I don't know if we do or don't. But I bet we're going to find out real soon.
Just my opinions!!
Go EXBX !!!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
