If you are basing everything you think about GDSM on that fact alone then you are doing yourself an injustice. It's all good SBW. If you are of a negative opinion I respect that. But it doesn't lend much credibility to your statements of business knowledge and the facts I have presented for you to consider. The statement isn't to discount any of your feelings, knowledge, experience at all.
But truly the point of the discussion is for the benefit of holders of GDSM, potential buyers of GDSM and how they might evaluate your outlook, statements, and actual credibility of one opinion versus the other. It seems that by avoiding all the things I mentioned that you should be considering, but you completely ignore, then it truly might make some existing holders or even new holders not have a true basis from your analysis.
I am not saying mine is any better or the correct one. I just present the facts. By ignoring and not even considering them your opinion maybe your own but truly does not do justice for these people. Now if you can respond to what I have written and really provide some credible factors that negate what I have indicated to be the potentials I would be more than happy to carry on that conversation. But if you do not then it might make me lower my value of your interpretation. I also think that is important for others to consider also. What probably is true. What is not. What fact actually hold basis and which do not and or do not because all factors aren't being considered.
GLTU
Go GDSM!!!!!!!!!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
