Symbian & Ravensburg are not mentioned in the contract.
If Bhang has such a problem with receiving stock instead of cash, why did they sign a contract that allowed that if all the cash did not materialize? They should have signed a contract that allowed them out if cash wasn't paid.
As the idea of pending funding was mentioned in the contract, Bhang must have been aware of where this funding was to come from and the risks involved.
If Bhang had worked harder to publicize the whole affair in a positive manner, Mentor's stock price would be much higher and the stock would be a whole lot more attractive. That would have been a win win situation for Bhang and for Mentor stockholders.
Even MJNA and Dixie lasted longer and Dixie's complaint was that they hadn't received the promised stock from MJNA. Bhang at least could get the stock.
I am not a lawyer and the above is my opinion.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
