InvestorsHub Logo

jugygales

06/22/14 4:54 PM

#175081 RE: stills999 #175073

I will try to explain this again and this is the last time.


If I understand you correctly you seem to be saying that independence of NTEK business lines (VODWIZ versus NP-1) means that this somehow frees NTEK to assist HHSE on setting up VODWIZ as some fake business.



No, you are not understanding me correctly.

What I'm trying to understand, given the presumption that NTEK is otherwise a legitimate company as indicated per Friday's news, what incentive would NTEK have in assisting HHSE in such deception? Can you be more specific in the type of scenario you are envisioning ... I don't follow your thought process.



I have no idea what incentive NTEK would have in that scenario. That was a scenario you just invented, not me.

Quote from Mr. Foley

NTEK has no dependence on HHSE for anything and is not intertwined with HHSE. NTEK created and operates VODWiz for HHSE.



I think that quote speaks for itself.

What I am trying to convey to you is NTEK and HHSE are 2 separate entities. NTEK was hired to set up and operate the VODwiz site, which they did, but they don't know the inner workings of HHSE, the company and vice versa. Here is an example: Say Walgreens sells a different companies cog and the cog company ends up being a scam. Just because Walgreens is legit doesn't mean the other company is legit.

I hope you understand now because I can only explain this so many times.

So what you seem to be saying is if 2 companies do business with each other and 1 company is legit by default the other company is legit. Now I don't follow that thought process