When the founder is banned from any involvement in JBII you can rest assured of WRONG DOING. You as CEO/FOUNDER/GENIUS?/CROOK BANNED from ANY participation in the company you created. How embarrassing... This is partially the reason for 10 cents.
"Bordynuik admits the facts set out in Part III and the conclusion in Part IV of this Settlement Agreement" READ HERE
Not so far fetched. If they had a good case to force settlement, as you state, why then issue a Wells Notice and Statement of Claim. There is no doubt that it was done to harm the stock. A settlement has nothing to do with a de facto admission of wrongdoing. JBI admitted there may have been an accounting error at worse and was willing to settle because of this. They had every intention of defending the case but the investors gave JBI no option - they were forced to settle. Those 2 issues combined with the fact that legal costs would be higher than the settlement, resulted in a settlement. Is was not reported on the SMB's? Wrong. Just how can anyone speculate a Wells Notice was being issued the day before JBI received Notice? It was much more than mere speculation and I expect the SEC investigated themselves as to how that could possibly have happened. Perhaps that why is the investigator no longer works with the SEC. If they were in settlement discussions why issue the Wells Notice and Statement if it was their intention to all along negotiate a settlement, as you've stated. Coincidences, I think not. Orchestrated, much more likely.