Replies to post #378 on Loch Harris (Old)

[FloridaRocks]

LMO: You talk Basher-speak! "I have stated many times that I am in total agreement that shareholders must receive their CDEX shares. But I also stated that the distribution must be performed as it was provided in the Asset purchase Agreement signed in August 2001, that is unconditional".
FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITED THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CDEX SHARES UNDER THE TERMS YOU WANT THEM ISSUED!!!!
This is a fact. Not a Muncasterism! Not a Lmorovanism!
You either have not done your homework, or your attorney is as dumb as a box of rocks!
Keep those cards and letters coming folks because the more you speak and the more you write,(Or your ghost writer writes), the more the trail becomes defined!

[INET6]

Lmo: Do you honestly believe that whatever decision comes out of the Court is going to make worldwide news.That the crooks at Loch Harris will be publicly plasterred over the networks for what they got away with. Do you honestly believe it will make the Wall Street Journal as a violation of the law.if the SA as written goes through.

Can you honestly believe that 2 years down the line some scam artists will say."We better not do that,look what the shareholders did to Baker and Boone".

For that matter do you honestly[/B] believe you will accomplish any thing except screw up the works so that everyone suffers.

Do you honestly[/B>]believe that your new found support group
really cares what happens to you,and/or LochHarris once the share problem is finalized.In fact CDEX may become their new target,depending on whether they are tied up with money makers or industrial competition.

Do you [B]honestly[/B] believe they give a darn about whether we lose our investment or not,or whether new investors fall
into a scam trap.

Being honest with yourself and your God is the backbone of most religions.

I'll leave you with that thought" AMEN

[preen2222]

Now LMO is trying to save the U.S. market system. This guy is nuts.! Send this latest example of his dementia to the Judge!

Lmo has been told repeatedly that the distribution under the APA would have been in violation of U.S. law. That is a fact.

In any event, the spinoff ratio under the Settlement Agreement will be 9.2:1 or better as compared to the APA which was 10:1. Now let me see--what deal is better for us?

LMO simply cannot get it through his thick head that in order to punish B&B in the lawsuit beyond what has been negotiated will mean years of basically fruitless litigation and will therefore fly in the face of his own mantra that "shareholders must receive their CDEX shares". The SA specifically states that gov't agencies may continue to seek whatever remedies and punishment they may have or desire against B&B.

Make no mistake, if LMO's declared future actions take place, he will be the one and only one who is delaying the distribution and hurting Loch shareholders.

Lmo justifies his actions as righteous, yet reiterates that he can be bought off. One could argue that his continued living off the tit of the U.S. Government is an injustice or that his receiving monetary and emotional support from market makers who wreak havoc on the U.S. market system and screw people day in and day out, is an injustice.

And he has the temerity to expound "justice for all". Why does our latest hurdle have to appear in the form of a Loch shareholder? Why do we we have to be subjected to this diseased mind? Just an example of our continuing bad luck.

Rest assured, his actions will not go unpunished.