InvestorsHub Logo

itwillgetbetter

06/09/14 11:59 PM

#14622 RE: TheSaint09 #14619

Speculating either the defense had some issues on the first deposition and halted it which got the judge involved do to the court order on said depositions or they were in settlement talks and they got approval from Oing.

Flip a coin on which occured.Maza is no dummy thats for sure even if I at times have gotten pissed off at him for withholding shareholder information.

No telling what ILNS is truely worth if only one of there products see the light of day moreless many.

No doubt a partnership is occuring anyday is my understanding.As far as judge Oing he is a sharp tack.

Here is Oings background and he don't care how big or small one is its about the law to him.

http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/comdiv/ny/newyork_bio_oing.shtml

This is eaxctly why I said when oing ask a question you better watch out going through that door cause there is most likely a starving Lion on the other side of said door.

Oing knows exactly whats occured in this case.To say thats so much bullshit on the record or thats what I understand is like getting hit in the head with a hammer.Don't go so fast was another insult to the defense.

Then he states later on then its becomes factual thats drilling them in the rectum sorry but thats just the way I see it.

Hamilton hight

06/10/14 11:18 PM

#14631 RE: TheSaint09 #14619

You are talking the best case scenario and of course we are all rooting for that. The way to impact the PPS for the public shareholder though, is to unite and have a voice in whether or not the percentage the public holds, be it 10 per cent or whatever, is diluted or not. If the best case scenario you speak of does indeed occur, it's not going to mean much for us if we are diluted. Where are the funds for the company coming from right now? And how are they being dispersed? Are they toxic for the public? We can't wait and possibly be victims; we need to be proactive.