InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

justasupporter

06/07/14 10:11 AM

#45701 RE: ecommceo #45699

Wrong. As long as the information is made public to everyone before trading starts there is no problem with it. Important is just that everybody has the same information at the time the trading starts.
icon url

CGardener

06/07/14 10:12 AM

#45702 RE: ecommceo #45699

it passed no such "law". it issued guidance saying that the use of social media, under certain defined circumstances, would be sufficient publication of that information for purposes of complying with Regulation FD. Regulation FD doesn't apply to pink sheet non-reporting companies. and even if it applied to FRTD, Parilla (shocker) did not follow the pre-conditions to do so. And emails don't count, anyway.

So.........
icon url

ch1007

06/07/14 10:12 AM

#45703 RE: ecommceo #45699

Here a couple of math equations for those that keep throwing around the multiple mathematical scenarios.....

Shorted before Friday Before May 29th + Didn't cover Short position by May 30th Market Open = SCREWED

People who are on the Long side + Merger = better than no merger any day of the week.

HOLD TIGHT!!!! JMHO.....
icon url

StockGod

06/07/14 11:17 AM

#45732 RE: ecommceo #45699

I was referring to Private Messages on Linkedin. Thats not exactly mass communication. Someone here posted that Tom had messaged them on Linkedin confirming ________________ << (insert forward looking statement here).
I guess Tom will never have to pay for a PR again! Weeeeeee, not like he can afford it right now imo so the next best thing is crawling around leaking ___________ << (insert forward looking statement) by what ever means he can.
Next stop IMO is Tom leaking _________ << (insert forward looking statement) on CraigsL. haha << (seriously).
I just gave Tom a great idea just now. You welcome TP.
TP should also prob stop using his neighbors wifi for awhile.