I completely disagree. Although I am not going to say it was 100% sabotage, it was clearly a deliberate act to switch the labels by at least one person....sounds pretty close to 100%...so I am going with 98%. PPHM clearly said in their legal filing against CSM that an employee deliberately switch the doses. Why would they make that claim so specific if they were not told that initially by CSM? They wouldn't....and CSM has not disputed that either to my knowledge, just that they don't feel they are liable if it was the act of an individual. As far as why nobody was arrested being your main point as to why this is not sabotage, that isn't quite the slam dunk you portray it to be to support your opinion. There are several probable reasons why no arrest was made:
1) The individual who made the labeling error (sabotage) may be claiming it was just a mistake. She just had a senior moment and didn't check her work. Hard to prove otherwise unless she slips up.
2) If she was paid to sabotage the trial by a BP, believe me when I tell you that it would have been done so covertly that even the CIA would be proud. BPs have big money and they are not stupid....they can create networks of espionage and covert actions that are pretty sophisticated. I bet she even has a big bag of money in cash hidden in some bank vault or maybe in her parents attic or basement that she can just grab needed cash from when she feels like it....and maybe she will be more daring to spend more of that cash 10 years down the line when all the heat is off and it becomes a dead issue.
3) CSM may have protected her initially as maybe she had a good rep with her coworkers and they initially bought her story that she just made an error. Maybe she was good friends with everyone who worked there and you tend to protect your friends. And when she left and they found out the truth, their covering her initially might have put them in deeper for liability, so now they are more silent than ever.
4) Law enforcement is a funny thing in this country. For matters of this nature, the criminal act most likely needed to be reported to the authorities before they look into it. Maybe because of 3 above, CSM didn't report it. Maybe PPHM didn't either as they expected CSM to do their internal investigation and left it to them as to how to handle it. But, let us say that it was reported to the FBI. Well, another funny thing is that they don't usually arrest people for acts like this unless they have clear evidence that it was a criminal act. So, the woman claims it was an honest mistake, the FBI cannot find a solid connection to a BP, her bank records don't show a large sum of money in any of her accounts and they don't have enough evidence to convince a court to allow them to search her home or parents home for big bags of cash. So what can they do? They need evidence and usually a lot of it before dragging her in and filing charges against her. Although what she did may be criminal, she may have covered her tracks just well enough to keep from being arrested.
So, those are my main thoughts as to why I believe your assertion that there was no sabotage because no arrests have been made. You are of course entitled to your opinion, but I feel your points lack strength to convince.