Replies to post #222695 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[andydub]

I noticed that too. It makes me wonder if the article is referring to the parts of discovery that the defendants did not ask to be protected with the protective order.

For example, some of the protection asked was to be able to omit documents in certain categories that are dated later than the swipe amendment. That implies that they are ready to give up the documents in those categories that are prior to that date.

So there are documents that were not in question and that are going to be given up, that much is certain. Maybe those are what the article was referencing and it was not about anything overheard in Judge Sweeney's court today.