InvestorsHub Logo

d4diddy

03/20/06 6:59 PM

#10057 RE: doyourdd #10056

doyourdd, the only problem I see is that patent application specifically states the energy source is x-rays and it does not specifically state the intended use as does the ASD patent.

{i]"A system and method for detecting a substance using x-ray fluorescence is disclosed. The detected substances may be explosives or controlled substances that have a specific chemical fluorescent signature. An energy source transmits an x-ray beam at a target...

I don't see how that application relates to valimed at all. Valimed uses UV. The subsequent patent applications claim the use of UV energy for testing narcotics, explosives and the like. IMHO those applications are the ones intended to provide the protection for Valimed.

You're trying too hard to convince yourself everything is alright. Just relax, what happens will happen regardless of all you do. The outcome of this one is predestined IMO.



sanddollar

03/20/06 10:37 PM

#10060 RE: doyourdd #10056

doyourown ...

who cares / what difference does it make who filed first? The key word would seem to be "patented".

Or are you a practicing patent attorney in your spare time and therefore so knowledgeable you speak The Word from the mountain top?