InvestorsHub Logo

Sax

05/21/14 4:00 PM

#21451 RE: rusty car #21448

Not on line posting nonsensical comments. FSNR will do well and then the gloves come off.


I found these two sentences back-to-back to be ironic.

Claiming without evidence that "FSNR will do well" is nonsensical. It's like claiming "the Ask will NEVER go below $0.10".

Making absolute statements about the future with no evidence is nonsensical.

I believe all the investors hope FSNR will do well. And I think a lot of the questioners are asking questions hoping to be convinced (by evidence) that this is likely. But making unsubstantiated absolute statements and implying that any questioning comments are "nonsensical" is... clearly contradictory.

welloff

05/21/14 4:21 PM

#21455 RE: rusty car #21448

Wait, which business is known well? Penny stocks or the oil industry?
I believe that was the advice of many in this trading platform, buy FSNR low sell high. In that venue, many have done quite well.
But if that's the case and FSNR is to be played as a mere penny stock, than I am certain myself and many other investors were led to believe otherwise, (that FSNR was indeed more than a penny stock!)
I didn't get in FSNR to play a typical penny stock, as I and many others were led to believe that FSNR was to be an industry changer and a legitimate business within the industry utilizing encapsol, ORUs, and aqueous, but that seems to be not the case?
Repeated posts stating next week, next Q, and boastings of potentials, and estimated data formulated by super computers with "golden moon crossings", are all embroideries that develop frustrations and distrust in FSNR and are entitled to questioning!
Secondly no one is claiming that any individual here doesn't know the business well, the questions are all concerning FSNR and its direction?
What's going on, and what's next?