InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Rushnattack

05/20/14 12:02 PM

#21984 RE: jb8893 #21981

all you said was look at it from a non-vested standpoint

a non-vested party could order and be happy with the products they receive

that person could then find the company is 3 weeks old and trades at less than one-third of a penny per share

they could also learn this company has gone on record as stating they have additional products in development including a tiny drink for the grass contingent. They've also gone on record as staing they are in negotiations with larger business partners

Is this an unreasonable scenario?

So you're taking Manny'e letter asking that we not all email Chris everyday as the definitive piece of the scam puzzle?

I'll give it awhile but understand I'm long and have several million Free shares


icon url

GreenBrickRoad

05/20/14 12:09 PM

#21988 RE: jb8893 #21981

Their site wasn't even built for proper dimension resizing across different browsers. That slideshow creates a mess in google chrome. If a professional was paid to build that site he shouldn't have received a dime. Very amateur level work.

I've been holding my tongue, seeing it's a new company and all, hoping ANAS would figure this out and fix it on their own. But here we are a month later, and it still looks like a wordpress 101 class project turned in last minute. They passed the class, but received a C- at best.