I was thinking the same thing as you, Henery, and am comforted slightly by Spec's response. Hoping that is the case here. I do believe in this BOD, and their strong resumes. I just don't understand how AT&T's announcements are acceptable, considering an NDA scenario. Who creates these "rumors" and why do some create positive outcomes and others not?
And although I am impressed that our PPS is as high as it is over a 1 year time, it still is not high enough to be used as a "value determinator" for VP. It's been implied that they don't care about the PPS (hence the no pumps), so why would they care if it popped up and then back down due to a rumor?
I've always felt the true value is in what they patents can bring to their owner. The PPS, IMO, is part of the game played around "betting" that big things are either going to happen, or not happen, with this company. The company doesn't "make" more money on the buys or shorts… they made their money when the initial authorized shares were sold.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
